Which Is Better for Liver Cancer Treatment: Interventional Therapy or Radiofrequency Ablation?

When it comes to treating liver cancer, the choice between interventional therapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) depends on several factors, including the stage of the disease, tumor size, and overall health of the patient. For patients with localized tumors smaller than 3 cm, radiofrequency ablation is often considered an effective option. This minimally invasive procedure uses heat to destroy cancer cells and may be followed by regular monitoring to ensure no recurrence.

On the other hand, if the patient has multiple nodules within the liver or if the cancer has spread to other organs, interventional therapy such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) might be more appropriate. This technique involves blocking the blood supply to the tumor, effectively starving the cancer cells and slowing disease progression.

In summary, neither interventional therapy nor radiofrequency ablation is universally superior — the best approach depends on individual patient conditions and tumor characteristics. Doctors will evaluate each case carefully to determine the most suitable treatment plan. Early diagnosis and personalized medical strategies are key to improving outcomes in liver cancer patients.